Back to Blog
Fangraphs data creator7/8/2023 We also provide options to visualize pitch movement with gravity added back into the equation or with the effects of air drag removed. For example, we slightly shift our reported values back to a release distance of 55′ – which more closely reflects the actual release distance of most pitchers – so that release points are more tightly clustered and velocities are slightly increased. “The Pitch Classifications are manually reviewed by Pitch Info using several parameters of each pitch’s trajectory and double-checked against several other sources, such as video evidence (e.g., pitcher grip and catcher signs) and direct communication with on-field personnel (e.g., pitching coaches, catchers, and the pitchers themselves).”īecause the PITCHf/x dataset provides the details of each pitch’s trajectory, we can slightly alter the default values to align better with reality than what is commonly reported. One navigation change is that the pitch-type split data has been moved under the splits tab.Īnd here’s some additional information about the adjustments that Pitch Info makes: You can even combine PITCHf/x and Pitch Info data in the same custom leaderboard. All PITCHf/x links and PITCHf/x fields in custom leaderboards will continue to work as they always have. I look forward to reading how you decided to score pitchers.If you have custom dashboards, leaderboards, or links set up to PITCHf/x data, this change will not impact any of that. They don’t get any credit for pitching in high leverage situations, but giving points for Saves/Holds doesn’t feel right even if it’s only a small amount. Batters get credit for SB and penalized for CS, and I gave pitchers a little bit of points for Ks to make up for the fact that pitchers seemed worth so much less even though batters don’t get penalized for Ks in my league.Īlso, I’m unsure what to do about relievers. An event gives a batter X points, the same event will give a pitcher -X points). Currently, I’m just assigning them most of the same categories as hitters, just with inverse points (an IP = 3 PA. The only LW info I found right off hand is for batters. One thing I’m having trouble with now is what to do about pitchers. Oh well – I had some down time, and it was my first year really doing fantasy baseball, so it’s probably just as well that I got a little experience before trying to do my own (I’d done fantasy baseball before, but those usually consisted of picking players and not paying much attention until the season ended) (If you have a custom FG dashboard or just want to take. Save it as something short, like FGdat.csv. Last year I was trying to think of a scoring system that would accurately represent things, yet for some reason I didn’t think of LW – I just sat there trying to crank out my own values. Let’s take FanGraphs’ standard dashboard data for qualifying MLB batters in 20. ![]() I’m setting up my own league based on linear weights for the first time this season. The value lies in those players who not only get playing time, but can produce more points than other players in that playing time. Using absolute runs solves this problem, in that virtually anyone with a pulse will produce positive points if given some playing time (Cesar Izturis produced 290 FP last year, despite his. The reason is that many of the fringy catchers and shortstops that might have to start at times on some fantasy teams actually produce negative values in Tango’s system. The only meaningful difference between this system and the one that Tango invented for hitters is the baseline: we’re assigning points based on absolute runs instead of runs above replacement. Neat, right? If you know a hitter’s actual hitting value, you know his fantasy value under this system. Not convinced? Here’s a graph using 2010 data: ![]() Here are the top-10 hitters by fantasy points in 2010, along with their wRC: NameĪny differences are attributable to slight differences in FanGraphs linear weights to those on Tango’s site (FanGraphs’ are a bit more generous, probably with a slightly lower penalty for outs), as well as rounding errors. If you total up a player’s fantasy points using this system, you will get a number that is going to be very close to ten times a player’s wRC. In other words, this points system literally is linear weights, just multiplied by 10. In fantasy points, it’s an AB (-1 pts), H (+5.6 pts), and a HR (+9.4 pts) = 14 pts. Similarly, a home run is worth 1.402 runs in linear weights (this is the average value of a home run, because they often at times with runners on base). In our fantasy points, a single is an AB (-1 pts) and a hit (+5.6 pts), which sums to 4.6 points. If you go to that link and look up the value of a single, you’ll see that the average single was worth 0.463 runs (in the lwts_rc column). I used Tango’s set of linear weights, specifically. These are based on linear weights, which are the basis for the entire family of w*** statistics, like wOBA, wRAA, and wRC.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |